Categories
Home
Cataract Treatments Questions
Cataracts Lasik Questions
Cataracts Types Questions
Cataract General Questions
Cataract Canine Questions
Cataract City Questions
Cataract Eyes Questions
Cataract Issues Questions
Cataract Lens Questions
Cataract Surgery Questions
Cataract Symptoms Questions
Site Map
 
 
   
what causes these results after cataract surgery by the Boston surgeon?

Question:
My sister had a cataract removed about a month ago by her local ophthalmologist and the implant lens left her more nearsighted than she had planned on, probably due to an error in measuring the eye length. She went to a specialist group in Boston and had the operation redone within a week. She is now about a minus 1 diopter in that eye, which was what she wanted, but she is extremely bothered by reflections and glare from any light sources anywhere at the edges of her field of vision. This occurs under all conditions, indoors and outdoors, light or dark. It is not due to dilated pupils. The glare can be reduced or eliminated by shading the light source with the hands or a visor, depending on the direction of the light. She was originally about a minus 6. The first operation produced -3.5 with no glare with an Alcon implant. In the second operation, an Allergan lens was used.

She has since been examined by the Boston surgeon, her retina specialist, and a third ophthalmologist. All say that the lens is properly positioned, and her cornea is clear, and can give no reason for the glare. They all say she will "get used to it."

Could this be due to internal reflections in the lens implant, or debris left in the eye from the second operation? She wants to know the cause before considering having the other eye done.

I am presenting this information second hand, as my sister is unfamiliar with websites, and so far has not found anything on the web. Perhaps someone here has had this problem and can offer suggestions. Any thoughts will be appreciated.


Answer:
Well, my first thought is to tell your sister to stay far away from doctor #2, not just because of the poor result but because the second surgery should not have taken place in the first place, at least not for the reason stated.

I doubt that doctor #1 missed by 2.50 diopters, not with technology presently available. More likely there was a mis-understanding concerning the expected vision and Rx power post surgery. A -3.50 result has many advantages for a person with a historic -6.00 Rx, superior near vision without glasses compared to those who have to wear glasses for near, with much better coordination with the fellow eye.For those who need to have surgery due tor cataract(s) please discuss thoroughly with your MD/OD and your optician *before* the surgery



Submit your comment or answer