Categories
Home
Cataract Treatments Questions
Cataracts Lasik Questions
Cataracts Types Questions
Cataract General Questions
Cataract Canine Questions
Cataract City Questions
Cataract Eyes Questions
Cataract Issues Questions
Cataract Lens Questions
Cataract Surgery Questions
Cataract Symptoms Questions
Site Map
 
 
   
Phacoemulsification (PE) vs. Extracapsular Cataract Extraction (ECCE)

Question:
Is there a scientific basis for his doctor's recommendation? In other words, is color an indicator for the hardness or softness of the cataract? If so, is Phacoemulsification inappropriate for a hard cataract?


Answer:
Yes, a very hard cataract (what they used to call very ripe) is usually very dark brownish in color. The surgeon may feel that the PE may require too much power or energy to break apart a hard cataract and that this can cause extra trauma to the eye and much more than a straight ECCE will cause. PE uses energy to break apart the cataract (sort of like a mini sound wave jack hammer) and then the pieces are aspirated (sucked) out of the eye. It is a very clean and less traumatic way to take out a soft cataract, but ECCE may be better for a hard one. ECCE basically takes the whole lens out in one piece. Example: you have a big boulder in the middle of your precious flower bed that you want to remove. You get your jack hammer out only to find it is very hard rock and you have to get a super strength hammer and by the time you are done the rock pieces and your constant presence has trampled and destroyed your flowers. Now on the other hand you decide to dig a little trench around it, tie a rope to it and get a small lift to just pluck it out of the ground. You are now done faster and with less trauma to the surrounding flower bed. But, by all means get a second opinion if you want, but my guess is hat the surgeon would rather do PE also but feels in this case ECCE is the better procedure.



Submit your comment or answer